TREES: LATEST CASUALTIES IN WAR AGAINST HOMELESSNESS
TREES: LATEST CASUALTIES IN
WAR AGAINST HOMELESSNESS
by on July 28, 2004
In the misty rainforests of the Brazilian
Amazon, foreign investors’ logging efforts have led to irreparable habitat
destruction, leaving creatures of all walks of life without food and shelter.
In the murky streets of downtown San Francisco , a similar phenomenon
is occurring. But in this case, habitat destruction is the motivation, not the
unintended byproduct, of tree-removal.
In a section of the city in which plant growth is virtually invisible amidst mundane high-rise buildings, the city is uprooting trees and removing awnings to deprive homeless San Franciscans of shelter. But this latest attempt to drive the homeless out of downtown has outraged community members, who claim that deforesting the most foliage-deprived part of the concrete jungle creates more problems than it solves.
In a section of the city in which plant growth is virtually invisible amidst mundane high-rise buildings, the city is uprooting trees and removing awnings to deprive homeless San Franciscans of shelter. But this latest attempt to drive the homeless out of downtown has outraged community members, who claim that deforesting the most foliage-deprived part of the concrete jungle creates more problems than it solves.
Over the past few years, the city has seen an
intensified effort to shift the homeless out of downtown. One of the most
controversial steps the city took was to remove the benches lining U.N. Plaza , where many homeless
individuals would spend the night or rest during the day. After intense
opposition from housing activists three years ago, the city went through with
the plan, spending $24,000 in overtime pay to surreptitiously remove the
benches overnight.
Since then, there have been a number of sweep-ups of “homeless encampments” throughout the city, including a mass displacement of individuals at Dolores Park last year. It’s no news that the homeless are consistently kicked out of local parks; but now, in a slightly modified approach, trees are actually being removed to displace those who use them for shade during the day.
In the heart of the city, there were once a dozen trees surrounding the Post Office at101 Hyde Street . The tall, leafy
trees at this corner of Hyde and Golden Gate beautified a block
that otherwise appears grungy and grey.
But there was a problem: often, one or two homeless individuals would stand, sit or sleep under the trees during the day, seeking refuge in the two feet of shade and shelter that the plants provided. When city couldn’t get rid of the people beneath the trees, it removed the trees from the street.
What remains are empty patches of dry dirt, interspersed along every two or three squares in the sidewalk surrounding the Post Office. As a result, a corner of the city that was once green and shady is now lifeless and dull.
It’s bad enough that trees would be ever be uprooted from such a fauna-less part of the city. But what makes the tree removal at Hyde andGolden Gate even worse is the
cause behind it.
Eliminating trees in order to displace a few homeless individuals can hardly be rationalized as a “neighborhood cleanup.” Instead, it sacrifices much-needed greenery in an arboreally inadequate environment simply to push a few people down to the other end of the block: a true Pyrrhic victory for the NIMBY’s in the Post Office.
No longer guaranteed a home inSan Francisco , trees, it seems,
have become the latest casualties in the federal war on homelessness.
The remains at the battlefield of Hyde andGolden Gate .
Since then, there have been a number of sweep-ups of “homeless encampments” throughout the city, including a mass displacement of individuals at Dolores Park last year. It’s no news that the homeless are consistently kicked out of local parks; but now, in a slightly modified approach, trees are actually being removed to displace those who use them for shade during the day.
In the heart of the city, there were once a dozen trees surrounding the Post Office at
But there was a problem: often, one or two homeless individuals would stand, sit or sleep under the trees during the day, seeking refuge in the two feet of shade and shelter that the plants provided. When city couldn’t get rid of the people beneath the trees, it removed the trees from the street.
What remains are empty patches of dry dirt, interspersed along every two or three squares in the sidewalk surrounding the Post Office. As a result, a corner of the city that was once green and shady is now lifeless and dull.
It’s bad enough that trees would be ever be uprooted from such a fauna-less part of the city. But what makes the tree removal at Hyde and
Eliminating trees in order to displace a few homeless individuals can hardly be rationalized as a “neighborhood cleanup.” Instead, it sacrifices much-needed greenery in an arboreally inadequate environment simply to push a few people down to the other end of the block: a true Pyrrhic victory for the NIMBY’s in the Post Office.
No longer guaranteed a home in
The remains at the battlefield of Hyde and
Comments
Post a Comment